Support claim(s) with clear reasons and relevant evidence, using credible sources and demonstrating an understanding of the topic or text. 4. Non credible websites are websites by people who post their opinions or their opinions of a fact. We trust that the author’s ideas are his or her own and can be backed up with evidence. The web-addresses are available on the Smartboard and I linked them on my web-site for easier access. They can refer back to their answers to determine which web-site, of the ones they reviewed, would be the most credible source. 4 0 obj Some students are able to continue this work and other students need to work on finding biographies, which is the first major step of the project. I start with one student and then we revise if necessary. %PDF-1.3 Doing this allows students to see the big objective in context and they can begin working on internalize what a credible source is. A simple question like this serves as a transition from the warm-up activity into the major part of the lesson where students will begin thinking about credible sources as it applies to research they will be doing for their own paper. websites registered by government and educational institutions (.gov, .edu, .ac); Many of these sites claim to be “non-partisan” sites that attempt to supply the truth to everything from urban legends to data cited by celebrities and politicians. This resource lists different questions that I point students to as they are looking up information. I need help finding non-credible websites . We trust that the author’s ideas are his or her own and can be backed up with evidence. I keep this in mind as I present this warm-up activity on defining credible sources in a school setting. In other words, your sources must be reliable, accurate, and trustworthy. Credible websites are trusted websites usually funded by the government, scientific, or college associations. i need some for non credible so far i have wikipedia and yahoo. This accomplishes the same goal as the other hand-out but it breaks it down in a more manageable task. Why educators … As students are looking at each web-site, I have them view them with a certain goal in mind. CREDIBLE VS NON CREDIBLE SOURCES By: Brooke Gowens Credible * LOOK FOR ESTABLISHED When we look for information in regards to a research paper, we can automatically rely on published books and articles because they have gone through the evaluation process before publishing. This list is exactly what would be expected during this stage in the research. Later the article goes on to inform readers about the difficult procedure to separate the brothers. CREDIBLE VS. •How dated is the resource? I encourage students to answer these questions for multiple web-sites. An unreliable source would most definitely be outdated and coming from the writers with no credentials. Citing non- Another way we can try to verify information is to use fact-checking sites. However, the domain .edu is reserved for colleges and universities, while .gov denotes a government website. BIASED SOURCES •Almost every source has some bias (an inclination OR prejudice towards one side). It is important that students spend time practicing these skills so I can make sure students are able to master this on their own. One must be able to have other ways to distinguish a credible site from it’s not so factual counterpart. There are fewer questions but they are more concise. This accomplishes the same goal as the other hand-out but it breaks it down in a more manageable task. The questions go in-depth at times but gives students concrete questions they can ask as they are trying to determining the credibility of the web-sites they are looking at. Regardless of what type of sources you use, they must be credible. Credible versus Non Credible Sources Credible sources are ones the reader can trust. This resource can be used for lower level students. If students are too far behind then intervention needs to occur. Does the author use “loaded language” (words that get a strong emotional reaction) or make broad statements that are not supported by evidence?